America has Left the Building

America has Left the Building

698
2
SHARE

This may be a little crude, but what the hell is happening to our nation? The federal government wants to cut benefits for those they casually sent to war, and reduce support for our nation’s poorest people while protecting big business. Where did my country go? The richest Americans are becoming more wealthy while homeless families and those living at the poverty level are seeing a dramatic increase in numbers. The very old song has become prophetic; ‘the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.’

At the center of dysfunctional Washington is a Congress which lacks talent and common sense. Both sides of the aisle are more concerned with getting their way, and the final result becomes lost in their disagreement. Deliberation and compromise have no place in our government today.

Case in point; nearly all Veteran’s organizations were in support of ‘the Veteran’s Omnibus Bill.’ There was bipartisan support for the bill which would have provided increased funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs, decreased the backlog of disability benefits within the V.A., made improvements in general health care services, improved and strengthen the new G.I. Bill, insured hiring programs for veterans are maintained, and expanded benefits for survivors of our military who lost their lives in war ravaged areas.

This is what happened when Senator Bernie Sanders brought the bill to the floor. Republicans objected to such a wide range of benefits; Democrats refused to allow amendments to the document.

Our government eagerly approves sending our military into a war. Not a single politician fails to praise our young men and women who fight their battles for them; the people of our nation do not declare war. When they come home alive, injured, or deceased, our nation’s leaders prefer to ignore them. By their actions, or lack of action, they display a complete lack of concern for the welfare of our armed forces men and women, and their families.

America is not a section of land within borders; America is people. When the people are cast aside through political posturing and in favor of concerns which support the advancement of our legislators, America no longer exists. The dream is deceased.

Not only has Congress reduced benefits for our veterans, it has also waged a war against the working class.

Through legislation which protects our wealthiest citizens, the working class and poor are experiencing a decrease in income, while those who have no need for more income receive the benefit of a failed Congress.

Between the end of WWII and the late 1970’s the income of working and middle class Americans revealed an increase which was closing the gap between them and our wealthiest citizens. Since that time the trend has reversed; the gap has widened to such a severe distance that it is doubtful that change will ever occur.

Both the number of homeless individuals and families, and those living at the poverty level have sharply increased. Politicians at federal and state levels continue to reduce assistance programs. In addition they are passing legislation to increase the standards by which these groups can obtain assistance.

The Oligarchy which is now our government has become all too powerful and self-absorbed. I say we fire them all. I don’t mean just the incumbents, I think they should all go. And when we install a new group make sure they have a two-term limit. Also we must eliminate political parties. Our founding fathers predicted our nation’s demise if they became too powerful; they were wise men.

Of course none of this has a possibility of happening; our votes don’t count, and Americans waste their votes far too often. The theory behind the right to vote was that our nation’s citizens would vote for the most qualified candidate. It’s obvious that this is not happening today. Voting purely along party lines displays a lack of intelligence. Some say it’s the ideology; that’s foolish. Neither party has an ideology; the only difference is that Democrats are more likely to vote for the average man’s interests.

What can we do? Today I am starting a campaign to encourage people not to vote. I know, some of us are concerned about who will become president in 2016. First of all, does it truly matter? Without the support of Congress, the President is virtually powerless. In addition, we don’t elect the president; the Electoral College has that ability. The man or woman for whom you cast your ballot can lose even if he or she receives the majority of the popular vote. Why waste your time and gas to give another politician ‘the good life?’

Commentary by James Turnage

Sources:

Inequality.org

Washington Post

CNN

Photo Courtesy of IIP Design

Flickr License

2 COMMENTS

  1. The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the majority of Electoral College votes, and thus the presidency, to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country, by replacing state winner-take-all laws for awarding electoral votes.

    Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps of pre-determined outcomes. There would no longer be a handful of ‘battleground’ states where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 80% of the states that now are just ‘spectators’ and ignored after the conventions.

    The bill would take effect when enacted by states with a majority of Electoral College votes—that is, enough to elect a President (270 of 538). The candidate receiving the most popular votes from all 50 states (and DC) would get all the 270+ electoral votes of the enacting states.

    The presidential election system, using the 48 state winner-take-all method or district winner method of awarding electoral votes, that we have today was not designed, anticipated, or favored by the Founders. It is the product of decades of change precipitated by the emergence of political parties and enactment by 48 states of winner-take-all laws, not mentioned, much less endorsed, in the Constitution.

    The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founders in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. States can, and have, changed their method of awarding electoral votes over the years. Historically, major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action.

    In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided).

    Support for a national popular vote is strong among Republicans, Democrats, and Independent voters, as well as every demographic group in every state surveyed recently. In the 39 states surveyed, overall support has been in the 67-83% range or higher. – in recent or past closely divided battleground states, in rural states, in small states, in Southern and border states, in big states, and in other states polled.
    Americans believe that the candidate who receives the most votes should win.

    The bill has passed 33 state legislative chambers in 22 rural, small, medium, large, red, blue, and purple states with 250 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 11 jurisdictions with 165 electoral votes – 61% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

    NationalPopularVote.com
    Follow National Popular Vote on Facebook via NationalPopularVoteInc

Leave a Reply